Platform

VPNs with a macOS client

Providers that ship a macOS client.

66 of 68 records in the registerOrdered by securityUpdated 14 September 2026

The HushFleet teamRegister of 26 September 2026

Providers shipping a client for a platform, one page per platform. This is the most commercial of the eight taxonomies and the least interesting to the security model: it says what you can install, not what the operator keeps.

A browser extension is not a system client and is counted separately — the difference decides whether traffic outside the browser is covered at all.

macOS

Ranked by security

macOS is worth 3 of the 20 platform points in the usability score (usability.curves.platforms): Android, iOS, macOS and Windows 3 each; Linux and Routers 2 each; Android TV, Apple TV, Browser extension and Fire TV 1 each.

All 66 platform lists here were read off a published page (U01_platforms, origin document). Nothing was run on the platform: the list says what ships, not how it behaved. 25 of the 66 also document router support, which is how a household covers the devices that will never run a client.

Not on this platform

Two providers without a macOS client

The complement over U01_platforms among the 68 ranked records, each with its security score. A record that later lists a macOS client moves from here to the list above.

Wire VPN 11 Portmaster 6

More platforms

The other nine platforms

Windows 68 Android 67 iOS 66 Linux 41 Browser extension 34 Android TV 25 Routers 25 Fire TV 21 Apple TV 20

U01_platforms has a closed vocabulary of exactly these ten terms: a platform outside the list is not published at all, so this row is the whole of what a record can claim to ship a client for.

What that buys a reader is a word that means the same thing on every record — the platform a record names is one of these, spelled this way, or it is not there.

Acceptable
1
Acceptable
2
Weak
3
Weak
4
Insufficient
5
Insufficient
6
Insufficient
7
Insufficient
8
Insufficient
9
Insufficient
10
Insufficient
11
Insufficient
12
Insufficient
13
Insufficient
14
Insufficient
15
Not recommended
16
Not recommended
17
Not recommended
18
Not recommended
19
Not recommended
20
Not recommended
21
Not recommended
22
Not recommended
23
Not recommended
24
Not recommended
25
Not recommended
26
Not recommended
27
Not recommended
28
Not recommended
29
Not recommended
30
Not recommended
31
Not recommended
32
Not recommended
33
Not recommended
34
Not recommended
35
Not recommended
36
Not recommended
37
Not recommended
38
Not recommended
39
Not recommended
40
Not recommended
41
Not recommended
42
Not recommended
43
Not recommended
44
Not recommended
45
Not recommended
46
Not recommended
47
Not recommended
48
Not recommended
49
Not recommended
50
Not recommended
51
Not recommended
52
Not recommended
53
Not recommended
54
Not recommended
55
Not recommended
56
Not recommended
57
Not recommended
58
Not recommended
59
Not recommended
60
Not recommended
61
Not recommended
62
Not recommended
63
Not recommended
64
Not recommended
65
Not recommended
66

On this platform

What the 66 records say: kill switch, split tunnelling, devices, protocols

Each answer is the record’s own and has no platform axis beyond “desktop only” (U08_kill_switch, U09_split_tunneling, U10_simultaneous_devices); the protocol list is the provider’s whole list, not what ships here (U07_protocols). The last column says where the platform list itself came from and the day it was read.

Provider	Kill switch coverage	Split tunneling available	Simultaneous connections	Protocols offered	Platform list read from
Proton VPN	On every platform	Available	10	WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, An obfuscated protocol	Published page, read 12 Sep 2026
Mullvad VPN	unknown	Available	5	WireGuard	Published page, read 13 Aug 2026
IVPN	On every platform	Available	5	WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, An obfuscated protocol	Published page, read 26 Aug 2026