- Not recommended1
Coverage—not published
Paying monthly$12.95monthly
Paying yearly—no yearly plan
Free tierNopaid plans only
0 out of 100Security
60 out of 100Usability
Owner
PureVPN, the group’s principal brand. One record, and a page rather than a gap: one provider is still the answer to who owns it.
Who the operating company answers to, from M15_owner_group. The corporate groups are the ones named in methodology.groups; independent is a value of the field rather than one of them, and it means the provider answers to nobody on this list.
This is the one taxonomy where a sibling can move a score. R02_cluster_contagion carries a finding against one brand into the integrity channel of another in the same group — scaled by whether they share infrastructure, and never applied to a finding that predates the acquisition. R11_evidence_voiding works the other way: an audit dated before control changed hands does not count for the company that holds the brand now. Both need M16_control_since, which is why the date matters more here than the ownership does.
What a page here does not show is how much risk was carried: the magnitude lives in security.breakdown.cluster and is not published on a record. Group membership, brand role and the date are.
Disrupt
More owner groups
Where M15 is unknown the record appears under no owner at all (five on file). That is the honest state rather than a gap: such a provider is often reported to sit inside a larger group, and publishes it nowhere anyone can cite. Independence is a fact about ownership and says nothing about quality on its own — the term holds records at both ends of the register.
