Servers in country
Providers with exit locations in Mauritius: a server here gives you an address in the country. The register’s table records no mandate for VPN operators here; the briefing below sets out what the law asks of providers.
Providers with exit locations in a country — a fact about a network, kept deliberately apart from where the company is registered. Only providers whose country list has a source appear: a provider that publishes nothing simply does not show up, which is a criterion already in the data rather than an editorial one.
In Mauritius the Cybersecurity and Cybercrime Act 2021 lets an investigating body require any holder of traffic data to preserve it for up to 90 days on its own notice, but puts the disclosure of subscriber data, real-time traffic collection and content interception before a Judge in Chambers. The telecoms regulator separately directs internet service providers to filter listed sites.
The Cybersecurity and Cybercrime Act 2021 (Act No. 16 of 2021) repealed the Computer Misuse and Cybercrime Act. An investigatory authority (the police or any other body empowered to investigate offences) may serve a notice on anyone holding traffic data requiring it to be preserved, or disclosed so far as needed to identify the providers and path of a communication (s. 26). Preservation may not exceed 90 days unless a judge extends it.
On application to the Judge in Chambers, an investigatory authority can obtain an order that a service provider offering services in Mauritius submit subscriber information (s. 27), an order for real-time collection of traffic data (s. 29) and an order for real-time collection of content data (s. 30).
The provider may be compelled to keep such an order confidential. The Act, in force since its proclamation on 10 December 2021, sets no standing retention period, and whether it reaches a VPN operator is not established.
Section 18(1)(m) of the Information and Communication Technologies Act 2001 makes it a function of the regulator to take steps to regulate or curtail harmful and illegal content on the internet. On that footing, Telecommunication Directive 1 of 2024, issued on 5 February 2024, requires every licensed internet service provider to run, at its own cost, an on-premises filtering set-up without deep packet inspection, operational by 4 May 2024.
The set-up blocks the sites on a list supplied by a rights holder in audiovisual content. For HTTPS traffic, blocking is at website level only. The directive recites that it follows a determination of the ICT Appeal Tribunal upheld by the Supreme Court (2022 SCJ 362).
Section 23 of the 2021 Act makes the administrator of an online account responsible for moderating “undesirable content” once an investigatory authority brings it to his attention. That covers content that is deceptive or inaccurate and posted with intent to defame, threaten, abuse or mislead the public, that threatens public health, public safety or national security, or that promotes racism.
A failure is punishable by a fine of up to one million rupees and penal servitude of up to 20 years. Misuse of a fake profile to cause harm (s. 16) and cyberbullying (s. 17) carry the same maximum penalties.
The account behind a post is identified through the provider: the production order of section 27 reaches subscriber information, and the notice of section 26 can require disclosure of the traffic data that shows the path of a communication.
The Constitution protects a person against search of person or property and entry on premises without consent, but a law made in the interests of defence, public safety, public order and similar aims does not contravene that protection unless shown not to be reasonably justifiable in a democratic society (s. 9). A person charged with an offence is entitled to a fair hearing by an independent and impartial court established by law (s. 10(1)).
The Judicial and Legal Service Commission appoints, disciplines and removes judicial officers (s. 86(1)).
The order of the rows is the security score, and a server’s location is not a recommendation.
Mauritius
Only a provider that publishes a country list appears here at all — 41 of the 77 on file. The other 27 are not missing research: they publish no list, and U02_server_countries is unknown for them rather than filled from the number their marketing claims.
A provider that says “100+ countries” and enumerates none gets no page on any of them, and the count printed on its own record is the length of the list, never the claim. With 41 providers behind 180 countries, the long tail of these pages carries one or two rows.
More countries
Coverage147countries
Paying monthly$9.99monthly
Paying yearly$53.88yearly total
Free tierYeslimited free plan
Devices10at once
Security
Usability
Coverage149countries
Paying monthly$14.99monthly
Paying yearly$139.08yearly total
Free tierNopaid plans only
Devices10at once
Security
Usability
Coverage168countries
Paying monthly$11.99monthly
Paying yearly$47.84yearly total
Free tierYeslimited free plan
Devices5at once
Security
Usability
What moved
Every row is the record’s own history[], filtered to U02_server_countries and P04_mandate_response; the whole log holds every field.
29 Aug 20261 changes
NordVPNResponse to a national logging mandateP04_mandate_response
not on the record changed to withdrew_physical