No data
iTop VPN
Paying monthly
$11.99 per month
Paying yearly
$47.99 billed once a year
Coverage
59 countries with an exit
Free tier
Yes limited free plan
Security
Usability
iTop VPN was assessed by the HushFleet team and placed in the No data band, with a security score of 9/100 and a usability score of 68/100. The security ranking does not place it: too little is published to place it — 37% of the substantive fields are established, and the score is a floor, not a placement. Commercial VPN, company jurisdiction
Not ranked — most of what would place this provider is not established. no_data is a statement about the research, not about the provider. It is assigned when almost nothing was established, or when — with under half the substantive fields established — our own ignorance is the largest single risk and the score sits below weak. Such a provider has not been examined and failed; it has not been examined. The second condition carries that ceiling because past half the record the sentence would be false however the channels fall out: enough was established for the number to be about the provider.
7 fields sit on this record without entering the score, and the contract says so in the field itself: scored: false. They are here because a reader asking who owns this company, or who signed the audit, is asking something the record answers — and because a value that never touches the arithmetic should be visibly outside it rather than quietly mixed in.
Every country the provider offers an exit location in, counted from its own server page: 59. There are no per-country server counts here and no fleet total anywhere on the site — the contract carries neither, and a number nobody can source is worse than an absent one. The 6 countries marked mandate impose data retention; that mark comes from the methodology’s own country table, not from the provider.
Alternatives
No data
Paying monthly
$11.99 per month
Paying yearly
$47.99 billed once a year
Coverage
59 countries with an exit
Free tier
Yes limited free plan
Security
Usability
| Offered countries that sit under a logging mandateC09_mandate_countries | United Arab EmiratesIndiaKazakhstanRussiaTurkeyVietnam |
|---|---|
| Country of the ultimate beneficial ownerM11_owner_jurisdiction | HK |
| Owner group cluster keyM15_owner_group | independent |
| Date the current owner took controlM16_control_since | unknown |
| Role of this brand inside the groupM17_brand_role | principal |
| Infrastructure shared with cluster siblingsM18_shared_infrastructure | unknown |
| Total published auditsV10_audit_count | unknown |
| Service class | Commercial VPN — security leads |
|---|---|
| Security score | 9 of 100 · No data |
| Usability score | 68 of 100 · state known · 100% established · 100.0% of the weight read |
| Legal entity | Orange View Limited d/b/a iTop |
| Jurisdiction | Hong Kong |
| Ultimate owner | Orange View Limited |
| Exposure | High · dominant channel: ignorance |
| Retention | Nothing that links traffic to a person |
| Latest audit | unknown · unknown · unknown · unknown |
| Countries with exits | 59 |
| Protocols | OpenVPNAn obfuscated protocol |
| Works under active censorship | Claimed to work |
| Weakest protocol still offered | not applicable |
| Own DNS inside the tunnel | unknown |
| Platforms | WindowsmacOSiOSAndroidBrowser extension |
| Simultaneous devices | 8 |
| Kill switch | On some platforms |
| Split tunnelling | Available |
| Signing up | No account needed |
| Free tier | A free tier with limits |
| P2P allowed | Allowed |
| Major streaming services reachable | Some services reachable |
| Price, monthly | $11.99 per month |
| Price, yearly | $47.99 a year at renewal, billed once |
Coverage147countries
Paying monthly$9.99monthly
Paying yearly$53.88yearly total
Free tierYeslimited free plan
Devices10at once
Security
Usability
Coverage50countries
Paying monthly$5.69monthly
Paying yearly$69.60yearly total
Free tierNopaid plans only
Devices5at once
Security
Usability
Coverage41countries
Paying monthly$6.00monthly
Paying yearly$60.00yearly total
Free tierNopaid plans only
Devices5at once
Security
Usability
Eight channels, each asking one question of the published record and reading a named set of fields to answer it. They multiply rather than add — the factor beside a channel is what is left after the pressure it found, and open a channel to see every field it read, as it is stored. How the model works
Security fields
67 55 of them feed a channel
Established
25 39 left unknown, 3 not applicable
Completeness
37% the share the model could weigh
Citations
43 across 14 documents
Every value carries what it rests on, and the model weighs the four levels differently. Weight, then how many citations on this record sit at that level:
B weighs 0.85 · 43 here
The weights are methodology.json’s own; a claim seen in the artefact itself counts for more than the same claim reported second-hand. The date at the end of a row is the day that value was last read.
A channel does not price every field it reads. The ones it did are marked along their edge and carry what they added; everything else was read and cost nothing. Only a channel that composes field by field can mark a field at all — the rest price themselves by the parameters printed above their rows.
Still open on this record.
No audit. No search of iTop's own site or of independent coverage turned up a penetration test or no-logs audit by any firm conducted on iTop VPN; V01-V15 stay unknown rather than no, since an absence found by searching is not the same as a document stating one has never happened.
No transparency report or warrant canary. The site's own sitemap carries neither page, which is the basis for P05/P07 = none, but that still leaves the record of handing data over, court orders and seizures (P01-P03, P11) completely undocumented rather than cleared, since iTop publishes nothing that would clear them.
Mandate-country hosting unresolved. The server list includes Russia, Turkey, India, Kazakhstan, the UAE and Vietnam, all under a logging mandate, and nothing on the site states whether those exits are physical hardware or virtual, routed from elsewhere (C09b_mandate_hosting).
Hygiene internals undocumented. RAM-only servers, server hardware ownership, DNS handling inside the tunnel, and anonymous payment options are not described anywhere found on the site; the privacy policy covers data categories collected, not server infrastructure.
On the record as a whole.
The EULA names the contracting party as "Orange View Limited d/b/a iTop", governed by Hong Kong law; the public "About" page never names this entity and presents the brand only as "iTop". Both documents agree on Hong Kong as the jurisdiction.
U07_protocols reflects only what iTop's own Windows spec page and its own blog post state the apps offer: OpenVPN (TCP/UDP) plus an HTTPS-disguised transport; no dedicated protocol-selection or manual-setup page was found, and WireGuard/IKEv2, discussed on the blog only in generic comparison posts, are not stated as offered by iTop's own apps.
Priced from what is missing: 0.37 of the weighted record is established, on a slope of 0.9 under a cap of 0.6, with a posture of 0.0 relieved by 0.4.
Record completenessS08_completeness
37%
derived from the record itself
Response to a national logging mandatealso read by jurisdictionP04_mandate_response
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Transparency reportalso read by integrity, silenceP05_transparency_report
none
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with P05_transparency_reportReported numbers plausible for this scalealso read by integrityP06_report_plausibility
not applicable
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Warrant canary disciplinealso read by disclosureP07_warrant_canary
Computed
×0.093 of a clean record completeness 37%
Where the drop comes from: Ignorance. It is the channel this record's risk is concentrated in — on its own it takes a clean record to ×0.433, and its bar above is filled to that.
Exposure is recorded as high and the integrity status as unexamined.
Against the rest of the register, this record sits furthest above on Jurisdiction — ×0.902 where the register averages ×0.680 — and furthest below on Ignorance, ×0.433 against ×0.662.
Published score
9Every row above is one field of the published record, and every one of them can be challenged: every row carries Report, or raise something about the record as a whole. A correction with a source behind it is made the same day, and if it moves the score it moves the rank.
none
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Security incident and how it was disclosedalso read by integrityX09_incident_handling
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Composed rather than added: a prior of 0.55 on the none branch, moved by what the paper says (0.0) and by what the practice shows (0.0), at credence 0.0 from the audit and 0.2975 from how the provider engaged, against a severity of 0.03 for what is actually retained.
Retention linkable to a person as declaredmaterialC01_linkable_retention
none_linkable
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with C01_linkable_retentionPersistent device identifier the provider holdsC12_device_identifier
resettable_ad_id
Bapps.apple.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with C12_device_identifierAt least one independent auditmaterialV01_audit_exists
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
How the report is publishedV02_report_publication
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Subject of the latest auditV03_audit_subject
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Server fleet coverageV04_scope_servers
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Auditor categoryV06_firm_category
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Assurance standardV07_audit_standard
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Date of latest reportmaterialV08_audit_date_latest
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Audit cadenceV09_audit_regularity
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
What the report states is retainedV11_audit_findings
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Strength of the assurance opinionV15_assurance_strength
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Chronology of documented enforcement eventsP12_case_history
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
What this channel priced on this record:Absolute claims 0.04Report concealment 0.15
User base scale (mass >=10M, mid >=1M, niche <1M)also read by silenceM08_user_scale
mass
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with M08_user_scaleOther businesses of the owner groupM10_owner_other_business
app_portfolio
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with M10_owner_other_businessTransparency reportalso read by ignorance, silenceP05_transparency_report
none
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with P05_transparency_reportReported numbers plausible for this scalealso read by ignoranceP06_report_plausibility
not applicable
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Documented gap between claim and behaviourX01_documented_lie
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Marketing versus audit findingsX02_claim_gap
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Ownership structure transparencyX03_owner_transparency
clear
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with X03_owner_transparencyAdverse events on the owner group recordX04_owner_group_history
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
How the service is paid forX05_monetisation_model
freemium_funded
Bitopvpn.comBitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with X05_monetisation_modelClaims of 100% anonymity or military-grade cryptoX06_absolute_claims
yes
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with X06_absolute_claimsAggressive lifetime subscriptionsX07_lifetime_push
no
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with X07_lifetime_pushCoverage exists only on affiliate sitesX08_affiliate_only_reviews
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Security incident and how it was disclosedalso read by ignoranceX09_incident_handling
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Affiliate programme and payout tierX10_affiliate_program
high_payout
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with X10_affiliate_programOwner-run review media discloses the tieX11_review_media_disclosure
not applicable
nothing published · recorded as asserted
App store data declaration against the provider's own policyX12_store_data_declaration
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Contagion from the owner groupS18_cluster_contagion
0.0
no owner group on this record, so nothing to carry
10 years in operation at 0.015 a year under a cap of 0.3, weighted 1.2: the rule fired.
Year the service launchedM07_launch_year
2016
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with M07_launch_yearUser base scale (mass >=10M, mid >=1M, niche <1M)also read by integrityM08_user_scale
mass
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with M08_user_scaleServer seizure by law enforcementalso read by disclosureP01_seizure_event
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Court record of compelled productionalso read by disclosureP03_court_record
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Transparency reportalso read by ignorance, integrityP05_transparency_report
none
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with P05_transparency_reportA capped sum — the one channel that adds: 0.172 of a possible 0.28, from the fields marked below.
RAM-only diskless serversC02_ram_only
unknown+0.018
nothing published · recorded as asserted
IP allocation modelC03_ip_sharing
unknown+0.012
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Signup without emailC04_signup_no_email
no+0.025
Bitopvpn.comBapps.apple.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with C04_signup_no_emailAnonymous payment optionsC05_payment_anonymous
unknown+0.012
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Own DNS inside the tunnelC06_own_dns_in_tunnel
unknown+0.012
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Worst third-party SDK category in the appC07a_app_sdk
attribution+0.035
Bapps.apple.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with C07a_app_sdkWorst third-party tracker category on the siteC07b_site_trackers
analytics+0.010
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with C07b_site_trackersWho owns the hardwareC08_servers_ownership
unknown+0.009
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Weakest protocol still offeredC13_weakest_protocol
not applicable
Bitopvpn.comBitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with C13_weakest_protocolClient source code publishedV12_client_open_source
unknown+0.018
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Reproducible buildsV13_reproducible_builds
unknown+0.014
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Separate client or infrastructure pentestV14_pentest_exists
unknown+0.007
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Where the company sits 0.0, where its owner sits 0.0, the exits it offers 0.05, the gag-order regime 0.05 — one circumstance, priced once rather than compounded.
Hosting in the mandate countries it offersC09b_mandate_hosting
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Incorporation country mandates retentionC10_company_under_mandate
no
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with C10_company_under_mandateBeneficial owner sits under a retention regimeC11_owner_under_mandate
no
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with C11_owner_under_mandateResponse to a national logging mandatealso read by ignoranceP04_mandate_response
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Secret-order regime in the incorporation countryP11_gag_order_regime
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
What this channel priced on this record:Price 0.05
Who operates the exitC00_architecture
unknown+0.050
nothing published · recorded as asserted
What the exit does to passing trafficC14_traffic_modification
unknown+0.050
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Server seizure by law enforcementalso read by silenceP01_seizure_event
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Actual disclosure historyP02_disclosure_history
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Court record of compelled productionalso read by silenceP03_court_record
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Warrant canary disciplinealso read by ignoranceP07_warrant_canary
none
Bitopvpn.com13 Sep 2026
Report a problem with P07_warrant_canaryRequests received in periodP08_requests_received
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted
Requests where data was providedP09_data_provided
unknown
nothing published · recorded as asserted